Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[prometheus-operator] is bitnami/prometheus-operator similar to stable/prometheus-operator? #3490

Closed
scottrigby opened this issue Aug 22, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@scottrigby
Copy link

Which chart:
prometheus-operator

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The similarly named stable/prometheus-operator chart has always been a misnomer, according to: prometheus-community/community#28 (comment)

Question: is bitnami/prometheus-operator similar to stable/prometheus-operator in that way?

Describe the solution you'd like
If it is similar, stable/prometheus-operator is moving to the prometheus-community org – but renamed kube-prometheus to more accurately explain the project it installs: https://github.com/prometheus-operator/kube-prometheus

In this case, would you want to either rename this chart as well, or merge efforts in the new prometheus-community helm charts repo?

Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A

Additional context
See:

PS, I haven't had time to dig into this chart, I only saw it on Helm Hub and Artifact Hub, so want to make you aware of the above changes and reasoning. Thanks!

@miguelaeh
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @scottrigby ,
Thank you very much for informing us about this. We will evaluate how the renaming will affect our internal tools and we will perform the necessary changes.
Best regards.

@miguelaeh miguelaeh added the on-hold Issues or Pull Requests with this label will never be considered stale label Aug 24, 2020
@juan131
Copy link
Contributor

juan131 commented Aug 24, 2020

I plan to bump the major version of the chart at this PR (#3498), check the PR to learn more about the reasons. If we're going to rename the chart, then we should include the corresponding changes on that PR

@jjangga0214
Copy link
Contributor

jjangga0214 commented Dec 28, 2020

@juan131 @miguelaeh
(Just notifying) Should this issue be closed?

@marcosbc
Copy link
Contributor

@jjangga0214 You're right, thanks for checking that! Closing now.

@marcosbc marcosbc removed the on-hold Issues or Pull Requests with this label will never be considered stale label Dec 28, 2020
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants