Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implemented QtStageWebView reload method #4

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 8, 2011
Merged

Conversation

ericpearson
Copy link

No description provided.

void javaScriptWindowObjectCleared();
void processMessage(Message* pMsg);
void resourceRequest(QNetworkRequest* request);
void resourceReply(QNetworkReply* reply);
void resourceRequest(QNetworkRequest* request);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can't tell if I'm missing a subtle difference (or if this is a bug with the diff)...are resourceRequest and resourceReply defined twice?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was actually fixing the indentation and code formatting, the diff makes it look weird since it's removing and adding the same line.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 8, 2011

resourceReply actually means "resourceResponse"

@ghost ghost closed this Aug 8, 2011
@ericpearson
Copy link
Author

Ah, those are tabbled? I removed a lot of tabs in other places, i'll go fix them

@ericpearson ericpearson reopened this Aug 8, 2011
@ericpearson
Copy link
Author

Added some more changes, should be good to pull now.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 8, 2011

looks OK for me, approved

@ghost ghost closed this Aug 8, 2011
@ericpearson ericpearson reopened this Aug 8, 2011
ericpearson added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2011
Implemented QtStageWebView reload method
@ericpearson ericpearson merged commit 7be2fef into next Aug 8, 2011
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants