Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

consider shared resources (across deployments in the state file) for assets #63

Open
blake-mealey opened this issue Nov 15, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Milestone

Comments

@blake-mealey
Copy link
Owner

To avoid duplicate uploads (especially to reduce costs for audio uploads) for the same assets across experiences, asset resources could be saved in a parallel shared graph in the state file. Then the aliases would be dependent on that graph and the experience in the per-deployment graphs, and would be saved per deployment.

@blake-mealey blake-mealey added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Nov 15, 2021
@blake-mealey blake-mealey added this to the v1.0.0 milestone Feb 17, 2022
@blake-mealey
Copy link
Owner Author

Tentatively adding this to milestone v1.0.0. On the fence about it, but I like the idea of prioritizing performance and scaling issues before v1.0.0. However, I don't think this is likely to cause breaking changes (it would cause breaking changes to the state file API but that should be handled gracefully under the hood with a migration) so I'd be OK with releasing later.

@jcphlux
Copy link

jcphlux commented Dec 16, 2022

I know what was suggested to me to help with the clutter of assets from multiple experiences in my group was to put all assets for an experience in a separate group. Being able to deploy the experience to one group but put all the assets in a different group would be useful.

@blake-mealey blake-mealey modified the milestones: v1.0.0, v0.12.0 Dec 31, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants