Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Always run required CI checks #149

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2023
Merged

Conversation

sarahmonod
Copy link
Contributor

As Matt said for python-comdb2: let's not do this.

As was realized in other projects, this conditional skipping of the step
doesn't play well with required status checks, which don't run and
therefore block the merging of PRs.

Signed-off-by: Gus Monod <gmonod1@bloomberg.net>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (eb85f1f) 90.06% compared to head (9093e47) 89.86%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #149      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.06%   89.86%   -0.20%     
==========================================
  Files          48       48              
  Lines        5574     5496      -78     
  Branches      873      873              
==========================================
- Hits         5020     4939      -81     
- Misses        554      557       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
cpp 75.16% <ø> (-0.14%) ⬇️
python_and_cython 99.93% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 8 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sarahmonod sarahmonod changed the title Always run required CI check Always run required CI checks Oct 21, 2023
@pablogsal pablogsal merged commit 772a0bc into bloomberg:main Oct 29, 2023
24 of 25 checks passed
@sarahmonod sarahmonod deleted the fix-gh-actions branch October 30, 2023 14:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants