ci: clean up coverage tasks

[thermokarst]

No description provided.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #12 (fa76e42) into main (e2b8e67) will increase coverage by 5.19%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #12      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.01%   94.21%   +5.19%     
==========================================
  Files           8       18      +10     
  Lines         255      588     +333     
  Branches       43        0      -43     
==========================================
+ Hits          227      554     +327     
- Misses         26       34       +8     
+ Partials        2        0       -2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
q2_moshpit/checkm/tests/test_utils.py	95.45% <0.00%> (ø)
q2_moshpit/metabat2/tests/test_metabat2.py	98.93% <0.00%> (ø)
q2_moshpit/checkm/tests/test_checkm.py	98.73% <0.00%> (ø)
q2_moshpit/metabat2/tests/test_utils.py	96.29% <0.00%> (ø)
q2_moshpit/__init__.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
q2_moshpit/checkm/__init__.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
q2_moshpit/checkm/tests/test_plots.py	96.42% <0.00%> (ø)
q2_moshpit/_version.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
q2_moshpit/tests/test_utils.py	95.12% <0.00%> (ø)
q2_moshpit/metabat2/__init__.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 1 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e2b8e67...fa76e42. Read the comment docs.

[thermokarst]

x-ref bokulich-lab/q2-assembly#20 - this plugin will have the same issue. we can sort it out in this pr, or another, your call @misialq

[misialq]

Hey @thermokarst, many thanks for these updates - these look great! I think I'd merge this one and take care of the other issue in a separate PR (although I am not entirely sure what that would entail, as pointed out here: bokulich-lab/q2-assembly#16 (comment)). I'll also update the CI of the other plugins to follow the changes introduced here.

[thermokarst]

A separate PR sounds good. RE your question to Evan in that q2-assembly post - the answer is "yes" - this is a problem in any of your plugins - you'll need to use conda for all dependencies in order to correctly build and publish on Library.

I think I'm set on this end for this PR, so feel free to merge if/when you're ready. Thanks!