Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support plural references #52

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Feb 5, 2015
Merged

Support plural references #52

merged 5 commits into from Feb 5, 2015

Conversation

danielgtaylor
Copy link
Member

This change refactors the way that references are created to reuse the
existing response handling code for loading resources. As a side effect,
this supports plural references.

This is mainly future-proofing and removing some code duplication.

cc @jamesls @kyleknap

This change refactors the way that references are created to reuse the
existing response handling code for loading references. As a side effect,
this supports plural references.
@danielgtaylor danielgtaylor added the enhancement This issue requests an improvement to a current feature. label Feb 4, 2015
@danielgtaylor danielgtaylor self-assigned this Feb 4, 2015
Adds more tests and fixes a couple of longstanding issues so that plural
references will actually work when used. Rather than just laying the
groundwork like previous commits, this completes the feature.
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.01%) to 98.59% when pulling d175554 on plural-refs into d2c8090 on develop.

@danielgtaylor
Copy link
Member Author

@kyleknap the latest push includes the JMESPath data member fixes we discussed yesterday and updated tests. Please have another look!

@kyleknap
Copy link
Member

kyleknap commented Feb 5, 2015

Looks good. 🚢

danielgtaylor added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2015
Support plural references.
@danielgtaylor danielgtaylor merged commit 646453d into develop Feb 5, 2015
@danielgtaylor danielgtaylor deleted the plural-refs branch February 5, 2015 21:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement This issue requests an improvement to a current feature.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants