New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding Message Flows to Pool Boundaries is Tricky When Pool Once Had More Than One Lane #950
Labels
Milestone
Comments
This relates to an issue reported inside the Camunda Modeler (camunda/camunda-modeler#1213). This could be a little nice improvement in terms of UX. Maybe it's worth it to put it inside the next milestone. What do you think @nikku? |
Our next milestone is huge already 😉. Let's queue this in our backlog for now. |
1 task
nikku
changed the title
Adding Message Flows to Pool Boundaries is Tricky When Pool Once Had More Than One Lane
Adding Message Flows to Pool Boundaries is Tricky When Pool Once Had More Than One Lane ASD SADSAD SAD SADSA DSAD AS
Mar 21, 2019
nikku
changed the title
Adding Message Flows to Pool Boundaries is Tricky When Pool Once Had More Than One Lane ASD SADSAD SAD SADSA DSAD AS
Adding Message Flows to Pool Boundaries is Tricky When Pool Once Had More Than One Lane
Mar 21, 2019
bpmn-io-tasks
bot
added
needs review
Review pending
and removed
backlog
Queued in backlog
labels
Jun 14, 2019
nikku
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 14, 2019
Closed via 19be51a |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Describe the Bug
When I try to connect a message flow to the boundary of a pool that had more than one lane this is only possible by dropping the connector at the header of the pool; not anymore inside the single lane of the pool
Steps to Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected Behavior
I can connect both pools like I did in step 2.
Environment
Please complete the following information:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: