Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Difficult to attach a message flow to a pool with lanes #1213

Closed
1 task
mschoe opened this issue Feb 12, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed
1 task

Difficult to attach a message flow to a pool with lanes #1213

mschoe opened this issue Feb 12, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
BPMN modeling ux
Milestone
M29

Comments

@mschoe
Copy link
Member

mschoe commented Feb 12, 2019 •
edited by nikku
Loading

Description

You cannot conveniently connect message flows to participants with contained lanes right now:

1213 connect message flow to pool with lanes

Steps to Reproduce

  • Model Pool with Lanes
  • Try to attach message flow to it
  • Presence of lanes make it super difficult

Expected Behavior

  • I can easily connect message flows to the pool borders, even in the presence of lanes

Environment

  • Camunda Modeler v2.x

Depends on bpmn-io/bpmn-js#950
@nikku nikku added BPMN enhancement New feature or request ux backlog Queued in backlog modeling and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Feb 12, 2019
@pinussilvestrus pinussilvestrus mentioned this issue Mar 20, 2019
Closed
@mitchhanks
Copy link

Is this issue related to it?
https://www.screencast.com/t/B4kNQG7VBA

@nikku nikku added the PM label Jun 13, 2019
nikku added a commit to bpmn-io/bpmn-js that referenced this issue Jun 14, 2019
@nikku
feat(modeling): ignore lanes when connecting message flows
2ba5389 
Closes #950

Related to camunda/camunda-modeler#1213
merge-me bot pushed a commit to bpmn-io/bpmn-js that referenced this issue Jun 18, 2019
@nikku @merge-me
feat(modeling): ignore lanes when connecting message flows
19be51a 
Closes #950

Related to camunda/camunda-modeler#1213
@pinussilvestrus pinussilvestrus added the fixed upstream Requires integration of upstream change label Jun 18, 2019
@pinussilvestrus
Copy link
Contributor

pinussilvestrus commented Jun 18, 2019 •
edited by nikku
Loading

@mitchhanks I can't reproduce the behavior shown in your video. Can you maybe open another issue where you briefly describe the bug shown in your screencast?

@nikku
Copy link
Member

nikku commented Jun 18, 2019

Closed via f16835b.

@nikku nikku closed this as completed Jun 18, 2019
@bpmn-io-tasks bpmn-io-tasks bot removed the backlog Queued in backlog label Jun 18, 2019
@nikku nikku removed fixed upstream Requires integration of upstream change PM labels Jun 18, 2019
@nikku nikku added this to the M29 milestone Jun 18, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
BPMN modeling ux
Projects
None yet
Milestone
M29
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@nikku @mschoe @pinussilvestrus @mitchhanks