Total runtime for examples

The data below is very outdated, we should check this again (and compare to Brian 1) before the final 2.0 release.

---

A rather unsystematic test of the examples, runtime includes everything (i.e. preparation time and the actual run). Results are always the best of three runs.

numpy

Example	alpha 8	runtime beta	current master (ff3cd83)
synapses_nonlinear.py	8.2 s	N/A	N/A
synapses_STDP.py	325.0 s	N/A	N/A
STDP_standalone.py	19.2 s	16.7 s (-12.8%)	32.5 s (+69.2%)
synapses.py	4.7 s	2.1 s (-55.4%)	5.2 s (+10.6%)
synapses_barrelcortex.py	218.2 s	428.0 s (+96.2%)	236.9 s (+8.6%)
synapses_licklider.py	13.3 s	N/A	N/A
synapses_state_variables.py	4.2 s	N/A	N/A
synapses_gapjunctions.py	5.0 s	N/A	N/A
cuba.py	6.7 s	12.2 s (+81.8%)	16.0 s (+138.8%)
IF_curve_LIF.py	5.3 s	3.5 s (-34.3%)	6.6 s (+24.5%)
synapses_jeffress.py	20.5 s	N/A	N/A
phase_locking.py	6.1 s	3.6 s (-41.5%)	6.5 s (+7.6%)
non_reliability.py	4.6 s	2.4 s (-47.2%)	5.3 s (+14.6%)
IF_curve_Hodgkin_Huxley.py	27.4 s	18.8 s (-31.4%)	17.2 s (-37.3%)
synapses_spatial_connections.py	4.4 s	N/A	N/A

weave

Example	alpha 8	runtime beta	current master (ff3cd83)
STDP_standalone.py	19.1 s	17.2 s (-10.0%)	32.0 s (+67.5%)
synapses_STDP.py	155.6 s	N/A	N/A
synapses_licklider.py	10.1 s	N/A	N/A
synapses_barrelcortex.py	149.0 s	177.8 s (+19.3%)	158.4 s (+6.3%)
cuba.py	6.0 s	9.7 s (+61.7%)	13.4 s (+125.1%)
synapses_nonlinear.py	7.8 s	N/A	N/A
synapses_jeffress.py	14.2 s	N/A	N/A
synapses_spatial_connections.py	4.3 s	N/A	N/A
IF_curve_LIF.py	5.1 s	2.6 s (-47.8%)	6.0 s (+18.7%)
synapses.py	4.7 s	2.0 s (-56.4%)	5.2 s (+11.5%)
synapses_state_variables.py	4.1 s	N/A	N/A
phase_locking.py	5.6 s	3.2 s (-43.3%)	6.0 s (+8.2%)
synapses_gapjunctions.py	4.7 s	N/A	N/A
non_reliability.py	4.4 s	2.2 s (-50.8%)	5.0 s (+13.2%)
IF_curve_Hodgkin_Huxley.py	19.3 s	14.1 s (-26.8%)	10.0 s (-48.2%)