Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release 0.15.0 #1204

Closed
busbey opened this issue Jul 29, 2018 · 31 comments · Fixed by #1216
Closed

Release 0.15.0 #1204

busbey opened this issue Jul 29, 2018 · 31 comments · Fixed by #1216

Comments

@busbey
Copy link
Collaborator

busbey commented Jul 29, 2018

Changed and needs testing:

New and needs testing:

@busbey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busbey commented Jul 29, 2018

@isuntsov-gridgain how's the Ignite version number update coming? I'd like to cut an RC this weekend.

@isuntsov-gridgain
Copy link
Contributor

isuntsov-gridgain commented Jul 29, 2018 via email

@busbey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busbey commented Jul 29, 2018

waiting on #1205

@busbey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busbey commented Jul 30, 2018

okay #1205 has landed. RC this evening when I'm off of work.

@isuntsov-gridgain
Copy link
Contributor

isuntsov-gridgain commented Jul 30, 2018 via email

@busbey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busbey commented Aug 10, 2018

release candidate 1 is now up: https://github.com/brianfrankcooper/YCSB/releases/tag/0.15.0-RC1

As a reminder, testing a given binding should at a minimum run through a load and a run phase. Ideally, one should go through the recommended sequence of workload steps from the "Running the workloads" section of the Core Workloads documentation.

@isuntsov-gridgain could you test the Ignite related bindings in the RC?

@adamretter or @Vogel612 could you test out the RockRB bindings in the RC?

@dbjoa could you test out the FoundationDB bindings in the RC?

@mpv1989 could you test out the updated ArangoDB bindings in the RC?

@ctubbsii or @joshelser have time to check out the updated Accumulo binding in the RC?

@dbjoa
Copy link
Contributor

dbjoa commented Aug 10, 2018

@busbey, I've tested the FoundationDB bindings in the RC according to your guide, but no issues are found.

@mvollmary
Copy link
Contributor

@busbey tested ArangoDB bindings in tag 0.15.0-RC1. No issues.

@adamretter
Copy link
Contributor

@busbey The RocksDB bindings in the RC appear to be good.

@busbey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busbey commented Aug 12, 2018

I tried out using the new minfieldlength and minscanlength with workload e and it checks out fine.

@busbey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busbey commented Aug 12, 2018

tried testing against an Accumulo 1.9.2 cluster with kerberos and ran into #1211. not a new thing AFAICT. I'll get a cluster without kerberos and try that.

@busbey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busbey commented Aug 13, 2018

verified the accumulo1.7 and accumulo1.8 bindings with both Apache Accumulo 1.9.2 and Cloudera's Accumulo packaging 1.7.2-cdh5.5.0 (on clusters that didn't use Kerberos for Accumulo client access).

I'll go ahead and close out the release in the next few days. if someone has a chance to test out the ignite stuff before then it'd be great.

@isuntsov-gridgain
Copy link
Contributor

isuntsov-gridgain commented Aug 13, 2018

@busbey
I've checked Apache Ignite 2.6.0. Looks good for me.
Also I made a PR: #1213.
It contains changes of README.md for Apache Ignite.

@isuntsov-gridgain
Copy link
Contributor

@busbey I've created the same pr (#1214) to staging-0.15.0.
I see that master doesn't have changes from my previous PR #1189

@busbey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busbey commented Aug 13, 2018

master has the changes from PR #1189 here: 7e19b75

are the README updates needed for this release or would they be fine waiting for the release next month?

@isuntsov-gridgain
Copy link
Contributor

isuntsov-gridgain commented Aug 13, 2018 via email

@busbey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busbey commented Aug 13, 2018

@mpv1989 any specific version number for ArangoDB testing?

@dbjoa any specific version number for FoundationDB testing?

@adamretter I presume the testing for RocksDB was 5.11.3 since it's embedded?

@busbey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busbey commented Aug 13, 2018

It would be nice to include updated README to this release.

Okay, that's fine by me so long as we can get the PR merged in the next day or two.

@busbey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busbey commented Aug 13, 2018

Here's a DRAFT for release notes. I can update them to include specifically tested versions in a way that matches what's currently listed for Accumulo and Ignite.

https://gist.github.com/busbey/77bf0f4bbbf122f73b5dd0844210991e

what do folks think?

@mvollmary
Copy link
Contributor

@busbey I tested arangodb binding against ArangoDB 3.3 and nightly build (upcoming 3.4)

@busbey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busbey commented Aug 13, 2018

release note draft updated with ArangoDB testing info. thanks!

@dbjoa
Copy link
Contributor

dbjoa commented Aug 13, 2018

@busbey I tested the binding with FoundationDB 5.2.5.

@busbey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busbey commented Aug 13, 2018

the readme update for ignite has been merged and brought back to the 0.15.0-staging branch. I don't think we need a new RC for the docs change (it'll get picked up when I make the release artifacts), let me know if you disagree @isuntsov-gridgain.

@busbey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busbey commented Aug 13, 2018

I updated the release notes with the foundationdb version. thanks!

@busbey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busbey commented Aug 14, 2018

release tag is ready to go and I have all the artifacts staged.

anyone have a chance to review the release notes yet?

@gkamat
Copy link
Collaborator

gkamat commented Aug 15, 2018

Reviewed the release notes. Look good to me. You might want to add a line indicating that JDK 9, 10 and 11 have been tested and are now supported for many bindings.

@busbey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busbey commented Aug 15, 2018

thanks for the review!

I don't think we're ready to call out later than jdk8 as supported yet. The Travis-CI runs are an enabling step, but we don't have good documentation yet on what bindings downstream should expect to have work (as an example of our short comings on the topic).

@busbey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busbey commented Aug 15, 2018

@adamretter
Copy link
Contributor

@busbey :-) yay. Thanks:-)

@busbey
Copy link
Collaborator Author

busbey commented Aug 17, 2018

Can someone take a look at #1216 so we can close out the release?

@adamretter
Copy link
Contributor

If it's just the change of version number in the readme, then that looks good to me

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants