Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New post: implicit getElementById #78

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

New post: implicit getElementById #78

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

xem
Copy link
Contributor

@xem xem commented Oct 3, 2013

No description provided.

@DTrejo DTrejo closed this in 1557acb Sep 19, 2014
@DTrejo
Copy link
Collaborator

DTrejo commented Sep 19, 2014

TAKEN!

http://wtfjs.com is now showing your post at http://wtfjs.com/2013/10/02/implicit-getElementById !! Thank you!

@xem
Copy link
Contributor Author

xem commented Sep 19, 2014

Cool! Thanks! I totally forgot putting that here last year. You can find a more detailed version here, though: http://xem.github.io/articles/#implicitgetelementbyid_en :)

@DTrejo
Copy link
Collaborator

DTrejo commented Sep 19, 2014

yes i should have published more quickly :(

want me to cut it in half and link to your original article?

this could avoid duplicate content penalties maybe.

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:06 PM, xem notifications@github.com wrote:

Cool! Thanks! I totally forgot putting that here last year. You can find a
more detailed version here, though:
http://xem.github.io/articles/#implicitgetelementbyid_en :)


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#78 (comment).

See my projects at dtrejo.com
Read my tips for developers dtrejo.com/blog

@xem
Copy link
Contributor Author

xem commented Sep 19, 2014

I'm gonna update my blog's article soon with the new informations from mathias bynens , so yeah, feel free to link to that one when it's ready... or copy its content

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants