Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Iss386] freq table basic coverage thresh #394

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
May 31, 2023

Conversation

BiancaMorandi
Copy link
Contributor

I have made the following updates to freq_table:

  • make it use _filter_out_months_based_on_coverage_threshold function generated as part of [MOMM] add weighting to calculation #298. Warning messages for data coverage generated for momm and freq_table are now generated by same function and therefore similar.
  • filter out both var_series and direction_series data when a coverage_threshold is given as input - this was a bug in previous version as coverage filter was based only on var_series
  • added option of setting a coverage_threshold also for the basic method and not only for seasonal adjusted option. Similarly to momm ([MOMM] add weighting to calculation #298), I have updated the coverage_threshold default value to be None when no seasonal adj is applied and 0.8 with seas adj. This was done in order to avoid generating a breaking change.
  • added tests and examples in docstring for new functionalities of the function

@BiancaMorandi BiancaMorandi added the enhancement New feature or request label May 22, 2023
@BiancaMorandi BiancaMorandi self-assigned this May 22, 2023
@BiancaMorandi BiancaMorandi added this to Awaiting Approval in brightwind kanban May 22, 2023
@stephenholleran stephenholleran merged commit 8b37b24 into dev May 31, 2023
@stephenholleran stephenholleran deleted the iss386_freq_table_basic_coverage_thresh branch May 31, 2023 12:28
@stephenholleran stephenholleran moved this from Awaiting Approval to Done in brightwind kanban May 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants