Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[no-ticket] remove flaky DataAccessSpec test #1763

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 6, 2022

Conversation

ehigham
Copy link
Member

@ehigham ehigham commented May 5, 2022

This performance test doesnt seem to verify behaviour in any of our code and is causing a lot of test failures in PRs. I propose we drop the test.

  • Submitter: Include the JIRA issue number in the PR description
  • Submitter: Check that the Product Owner has signed off on any user-facing changes
  • Submitter: Make sure Swagger is updated if API changes
    • ...and Orchestration's Swagger too!
  • Submitter: If updating admin endpoints, also update firecloud-admin-cli
  • Submitter: Check documentation and code comments. Add explanatory PR comments if helpful.
  • Submitter: JIRA ticket checks:
    • Acceptance criteria exists and is met
    • Note any changes to implementation from the description
    • To Demo flag is set
    • Release Summary is filled out, if applicable
    • Add notes on how to QA
  • Submitter: Update RC_XXX release ticket with any config or environment changes necessary
  • Submitter: Database checks:
    • If PR includes new or changed db queries, include the explain plans in the description
    • Make sure liquibase is updated if appropriate
    • If doing a migration, take a backup of the
      dev
      and
      alpha
      DBs in Google Cloud Console
  • Submitter: Update FISMA documentation if changes to:
    • Authentication
    • Authorization
    • Encryption
    • Audit trails
  • Tell your tech lead (TL) that the PR exists if they want to look at it
  • Anoint a lead reviewer (LR). Assign PR to LR
  • Review cycle:
    • LR reviews
    • Rest of team may comment on PR at will
    • LR assigns to submitter for feedback fixes
    • Submitter rebases to develop again if necessary
    • Submitter makes further commits. DO NOT SQUASH
    • Submitter updates documentation as needed
    • Submitter reassigns to LR for further feedback
  • TL sign off
  • LR sign off
  • Assign to submitter to finalize
  • Submitter: Verify all tests go green, including CI tests
  • Submitter: Squash commits and merge to develop
  • Submitter: Delete branch after merge
  • Submitter: Test this change works on dev environment after deployment. YOU own getting it fixed if dev isn't working for ANY reason!
  • Submitter: Verify swagger UI on dev environment still works after deployment
  • Submitter: Inform other teams of any API changes via Slack and/or email
  • Submitter: Mark JIRA issue as resolved once this checklist is completed

@ehigham ehigham changed the title [no-ticket] remove flakey performance test [no-ticket] remove flakey DataAccessSpec test May 5, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@aherbst-broad aherbst-broad left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, I am in favor of removing this flakey test.

@davidangb
Copy link
Contributor

IF we decide to remove this, I believe the mysql-low-thread-count db config is no longer used, and should be cleaned up as well. I'd also suggest with whoever wrote/knows about this test to see about its usefulness

@ehigham
Copy link
Member Author

ehigham commented May 5, 2022

IF we decide to remove this, I believe the mysql-low-thread-count db config is no longer used, and should be cleaned up as well. I'd also suggest with whoever wrote/knows about this test to see about its usefulness

Good call about the config. I'll look into that.
I believe @jmthibault79 wrote this test?

@ehigham ehigham requested a review from jmthibault79 May 5, 2022 20:25
@ehigham ehigham changed the title [no-ticket] remove flakey DataAccessSpec test [no-ticket] remove flaky DataAccessSpec test May 5, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@davidangb davidangb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ehigham I dug a bit and I believe this test was written to guard against slick/slick#1274. A fix for that issue was released in Slick 3.2.0. Since we are now on 3.3.2 I believe it is safe to remove this test.

@ehigham
Copy link
Member Author

ehigham commented May 5, 2022

@ehigham I dug a bit and I believe this test was written to guard against slick/slick#1274. A fix for that issue was released in Slick 3.2.0. Since we are now on 3.3.2 I believe it is safe to remove this test.

Thank you for digging!

@ehigham ehigham merged commit c82cdd2 into develop May 6, 2022
@ehigham ehigham deleted the ehigham--antidandruff-shampoo branch May 6, 2022 17:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
4 participants