feat: handle rename when parent module is imported

[browniebroke]

fixes #63

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #347 (86cb14f) into main (beb3c23) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              main      #347    +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%            
==========================================
  Files           23        26     +3     
  Lines          742       900   +158     
==========================================
+ Hits           742       900   +158     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
django_codemod/visitors/base.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
django_codemod/visitors/core.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
django_codemod/visitors/decorators.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
django_codemod/visitors/urls.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
django_codemod/visitors/__init__.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
django_codemod/__init__.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update beb3c23...86cb14f. Read the comment docs.

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

❌  Merging this PR will decrease code quality in the affected files by 6.42%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	0.95 ⭐	2.81 ⭐	1.86 👎
Method Length	26.64 ⭐	28.97 ⭐	2.33 👎
Working memory	5.88 ⭐	7.39 🙂	1.51 👎
Quality	88.41% ⭐	81.99% ⭐	-6.42% 👎

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	567	762	195

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
django_codemod/visitors/base.py	85.01% ⭐	68.85% 🙂	-16.16% 👎
django_codemod/visitors/core.py	98.17% ⭐	98.17% ⭐	0.00%
django_codemod/visitors/decorators.py	87.33% ⭐	88.82% ⭐	1.49% 👍
django_codemod/visitors/urls.py	81.65% ⭐	79.80% ⭐	-1.85% 👎
tests/visitors/test_base.py	95.20% ⭐	95.46% ⭐	0.26% 👍
tests/visitors/test_core.py	96.34% ⭐	96.34% ⭐	0.00%

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
django_codemod/visitors/base.py	import_from_matches.BaseRenameTransformer._check_import_from_exact	22 😞	133 😞	17 ⛔	35.55% 😞	Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
django_codemod/visitors/base.py	import_from_matches.BaseRenameTransformer._check_import_from_parent	11 🙂	142 😞	15 😞	45.29% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
django_codemod/visitors/base.py	import_from_matches.BaseRenameTransformer.leave_Attribute	2 ⭐	48 ⭐	12 😞	71.18% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
tests/visitors/test_base.py	test_module_matcher	0 ⭐	78 🙂	10 😞	72.15% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions
django_codemod/visitors/base.py	import_from_matches.BaseRenameTransformer._check_import_from_child	3 ⭐	49 ⭐	10 😞	73.66% 🙂	Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Let us know what you think of it by mentioning @sourcery-ai in a comment.