-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
initial insert when registering invocation attempt doesn't need to be in a transaction #5865
Merged
tempoz
merged 1 commit into
master
from
no-transaction-on-initial-insert-invocation-attempt
Mar 18, 2024
Merged
initial insert when registering invocation attempt doesn't need to be in a transaction #5865
tempoz
merged 1 commit into
master
from
no-transaction-on-initial-insert-invocation-attempt
Mar 18, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Feb 8, 2024
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
This was referenced Feb 8, 2024
tempoz
force-pushed
the
remove-transactions-surrounding-single-queries
branch
from
February 13, 2024 19:49
5c0c37f
to
9d32875
Compare
tempoz
force-pushed
the
no-transaction-on-initial-insert-invocation-attempt
branch
from
February 13, 2024 19:49
808c6d4
to
1d6758d
Compare
tempoz
force-pushed
the
remove-transactions-surrounding-single-queries
branch
from
February 16, 2024 19:18
9d32875
to
acc3bef
Compare
tempoz
force-pushed
the
no-transaction-on-initial-insert-invocation-attempt
branch
from
February 16, 2024 19:18
1d6758d
to
b6c5994
Compare
tempoz
force-pushed
the
remove-transactions-surrounding-single-queries
branch
from
February 20, 2024 17:19
acc3bef
to
791c8c7
Compare
tempoz
force-pushed
the
no-transaction-on-initial-insert-invocation-attempt
branch
from
February 20, 2024 17:19
b6c5994
to
11efa0e
Compare
tempoz
force-pushed
the
remove-transactions-surrounding-single-queries
branch
from
February 20, 2024 18:09
791c8c7
to
adc4c3a
Compare
tempoz
force-pushed
the
no-transaction-on-initial-insert-invocation-attempt
branch
from
February 20, 2024 18:09
11efa0e
to
dba5013
Compare
tempoz
force-pushed
the
remove-transactions-surrounding-single-queries
branch
from
February 22, 2024 23:42
adc4c3a
to
6b9b8c0
Compare
tempoz
force-pushed
the
no-transaction-on-initial-insert-invocation-attempt
branch
from
February 22, 2024 23:42
dba5013
to
c8644f4
Compare
tempoz
force-pushed
the
remove-transactions-surrounding-single-queries
branch
from
February 23, 2024 20:44
6b9b8c0
to
e8a33c8
Compare
tempoz
force-pushed
the
no-transaction-on-initial-insert-invocation-attempt
branch
from
February 23, 2024 20:44
c8644f4
to
6614f2f
Compare
tempoz
force-pushed
the
remove-transactions-surrounding-single-queries
branch
from
February 23, 2024 22:36
e8a33c8
to
f152c1a
Compare
tempoz
force-pushed
the
no-transaction-on-initial-insert-invocation-attempt
branch
from
February 23, 2024 22:36
6614f2f
to
45f6c49
Compare
tempoz
force-pushed
the
remove-transactions-surrounding-single-queries
branch
from
February 26, 2024 22:00
f152c1a
to
98d4a6f
Compare
tempoz
force-pushed
the
no-transaction-on-initial-insert-invocation-attempt
branch
from
February 26, 2024 22:00
45f6c49
to
a4adf1f
Compare
This was referenced Feb 26, 2024
Base automatically changed from
remove-transactions-surrounding-single-queries
to
master
February 26, 2024 22:50
tempoz
force-pushed
the
no-transaction-on-initial-insert-invocation-attempt
branch
from
February 26, 2024 22:51
a4adf1f
to
97ef725
Compare
tempoz
changed the base branch from
master
to
check-for-missing-after-execution-update
February 27, 2024 19:59
tempoz
force-pushed
the
no-transaction-on-initial-insert-invocation-attempt
branch
from
February 27, 2024 19:59
97ef725
to
4b4719f
Compare
Base automatically changed from
check-for-missing-after-execution-update
to
master
February 27, 2024 22:41
tempoz
force-pushed
the
no-transaction-on-initial-insert-invocation-attempt
branch
from
February 27, 2024 22:44
4b4719f
to
8c8cd01
Compare
This was referenced Feb 27, 2024
bduffany
approved these changes
Feb 28, 2024
… in a transaction <correct>
tempoz
force-pushed
the
no-transaction-on-initial-insert-invocation-attempt
branch
from
March 1, 2024 00:33
8c8cd01
to
c33c04e
Compare
This was referenced Mar 1, 2024
This was referenced Mar 18, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If the initial insert fails when registering an invocation attempt, nothing is or needs to be locked, and the insert has had no effects to roll back. If the insert succeeds, however the transaction ends. Thus, it does not to be included in the transaction.
Related issues: N/A