Strip out pbjson since we don't need it
#310
Conversation
sporkmonger
added
kind/cleanup
WalkthroughThe recent updates to the Changes
Tip New Features and ImprovementsReview SettingsIntroduced new personality profiles for code reviews. Users can now select between "Chill" and "Assertive" review tones to tailor feedback styles according to their preferences. The "Assertive" profile posts more comments and nitpicks the code more aggressively, while the "Chill" profile is more relaxed and posts fewer comments. AST-based InstructionsCodeRabbit offers customizing reviews based on the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) pattern matching. Read more about AST-based instructions in the documentation. Community-driven AST-based RulesWe are kicking off a community-driven initiative to create and share AST-based rules. Users can now contribute their AST-based rules to detect security vulnerabilities, code smells, and anti-patterns. Please see the ast-grep-essentials repository for more information. New Static Analysis ToolsWe are continually expanding our support for static analysis tools. We have added support for Tone SettingsUsers can now customize CodeRabbit to review code in the style of their favorite characters or personalities. Here are some of our favorite examples:
Revamped Settings PageWe have redesigned the settings page for a more intuitive layout, enabling users to find and adjust settings quickly. This change was long overdue; it not only improves the user experience but also allows our development team to add more settings in the future with ease. Going forward, the changes to Miscellaneous
TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
Hi there 👋, @DryRunSecurity here, below is a summary of our analysis and findings.
Note 🟢 Risk threshold not exceeded. Change Summary (click to expand)The following is a summary of changes in this pull request made by me, your security buddy 🤖. Note that this summary is auto-generated and not meant to be a definitive list of security issues but rather a helpful summary from a security perspective. Summary: The code changes in this pull request primarily involve updates to dependencies and build configurations related to the Envoy proxy project's The key changes include:
While these changes do not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, it's important to review the impact of the protobuf implementation change and ensure that the new implementation does not introduce any compatibility issues or security concerns. Additionally, the overall build process and the generated Rust code should be reviewed to verify that input validation, authorization, error handling, and other security-critical aspects are properly implemented. Files Changed:
Powered by DryRun Security |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (3)
- crates/ext-processor/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- crates/ext-processor/build.rs (1 hunks)
- crates/ext-processor/src/protobuf.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- crates/ext-processor/build.rs
- crates/ext-processor/src/protobuf.rs
Additional comments not posted (2)
crates/ext-processor/Cargo.toml (2)
37-37: Addedprost-typesdependency.Ensure that this new dependency integrates well with the existing system and does not introduce any conflicts.
37-37: Updatedtonic-buildto version0.9.2.Verification successful
The verification process did not reveal any explicit compatibility issues or conflicts related to
tonic-buildversion0.9.2in the Cargo.toml files. The search results primarily listed various dependencies but did not indicate any specific problems.
- crates/ext-processor/Cargo.toml:
tonic-build = "0.9.2"Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify compatibility of `tonic-build` version `0.9.2` with other dependencies. # Test: Check for any known issues with `tonic-build` version `0.9.2`. rg --type toml $'tonic-build = "0.9.2"' --files-with-matches | xargs cat | grep -i "known issues"Length of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence of `tonic-build` version `0.9.2` in Cargo.toml files and check for compatibility issues. # Search for `tonic-build` in Cargo.toml files rg --type toml 'tonic-build = "0.9.2"' # Check for compatibility issues with other dependencies rg --type toml 'tonic-build' | xargs -I {} sh -c 'cat {} && echo "----"' | grep -i -E 'conflict|incompatible|error|issue'Length of output: 591
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence of `tonic-build` version `0.9.2` in Cargo.toml files and check for compatibility issues. # Search for `tonic-build` in Cargo.toml files rg --type toml 'tonic-build = "0.9.2"' # Check for compatibility issues with other dependencies rg --type toml 'tonic-build' --files-with-matches | xargs cat | grep -i -E 'conflict|incompatible|error|issue'Length of output: 838
We removed most of the JSON stuff for protobufs, but didn't remove the
pbjsondependency. This removes it.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores
Refactor