Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sig-packaging #87

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

calvinrp
Copy link
Contributor

@calvinrp calvinrp commented May 22, 2024

Draft proposal for SIG-Registries -> SIG-Packaging

@calvinrp calvinrp marked this pull request as draft May 22, 2024 21:21
Co-authored-by: Lann <github-lann@lannbox.com>
@calvinrp calvinrp marked this pull request as ready for review May 24, 2024 18:11
@ricochet
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your effort towards transparency to reflect the SIG's current scope and efforts.

This is essentially a reboot of the SIG. We in the TSC agree that it makes sense for the reboot to reflect the founding members listed in this document.

Because this is a reboot, we would like for this SIG to consider onboarding with existing SIG processes (now that we have them). This includes adding the SIG meeting to the Bytecode Alliance events calendar for public visibility, onboarding to password management (if needed), and management via the bytecodealliance.org google workspace for groups. Please work with @disquisitioner for assistance.

The TSC has reviewed this project proposal and find it in order.

@calvinrp
Copy link
Contributor Author

Great! @ricochet merge the PR?

@ricochet
Copy link
Contributor

Once the reboot has completed by archiving or renaming any necessary repos, onboarding to existing tools, etc, we'll close the issue.

@calvinrp
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closed and replaced with #92

disquisitioner added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2024
Creating the new SIG Packaging, per TSC approval in an earlier PR (#87).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants