Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use nixpkgs#gleam package instead of vic/gleam-nix #627

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 27, 2023

Conversation

vic
Copy link
Contributor

@vic vic commented May 27, 2023

The nixpkgs repository already has a community maintained derivation for Gleam. Use that in the example Gleam project.

People would only need to use vic/gleam-nix flake when building non-released Gleam versions or contributing to Gleam itself.

Closes #610 by using already pre-cached nixpkgs gleam.

The nixpkgs repository already has a community maintained
derivation for Gleam. Use that in the example Gleam project.

People would only need to use vic/gleam-nix flake when
building non-released Gleam versions or contributing to Gleam
itself.
@domenkozar domenkozar merged commit b0bc8ec into cachix:main May 27, 2023
88 of 89 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Question about CI and third-party binary caches.
2 participants