Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

OmniSharp needs to be kept in sync with Cake's default assembly references #86

Closed
jnm2 opened this issue Nov 29, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

OmniSharp needs to be kept in sync with Cake's default assembly references #86

jnm2 opened this issue Nov 29, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees
@bjorkstromm
Labels
Bug
Milestone
0.3.0

Comments

@jnm2
Copy link

jnm2 commented Nov 29, 2017

OmniSharp is incorrectly marking ZipFile as not found even though Cake compiles and runs fine.
@jnm2 jnm2 mentioned this issue Nov 29, 2017
Open
@bjorkstromm bjorkstromm added this to the 0.2.1 milestone Dec 12, 2017
@bjorkstromm bjorkstromm self-assigned this Dec 12, 2017
@bjorkstromm
Copy link
Member

@jnm2 we needed to publish 0.2.0 quickly in order to get the performance improvements into next OmniSharp release. I'll create a hotfix for fixing this in a not so distant future however.

@jnm2 jnm2 mentioned this issue Dec 15, 2017
Closed
@bjorkstromm bjorkstromm modified the milestones: 0.2.1, 0.3.0 Feb 6, 2018
bjorkstromm added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 6, 2018
@bjorkstromm
(GH-86) Add Cake.Common references to default list
db7c7f7 
- Fixes #86
- In the future we should look at resolving these dynamically.
@bjorkstromm bjorkstromm mentioned this issue Feb 6, 2018
Merged
bjorkstromm added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 7, 2018
@bjorkstromm
Merge pull request #95 from cake-build/feature/GH-86
6a6134a 
GH86: Add Cake.Common references to default list
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@bjorkstromm bjorkstromm

Labels
Bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.3.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@bjorkstromm @jnm2