2.2 resourcesprefix

[ceeram]

Enable admin (or other configured routing prefixes) for mapResources()

[markstory]

Would you want prefixed resource routes without the prefix in the URL? How does this interact with normal web requests? Seems like in the example of the tests /posts would actually be an admin method, which isn't clear. Could we do something smarter like also set the prefix option based on the routing prefix if the classic prefix option is undefined? That is similar to the reworked mapResources() + prefixes in 3.0

[ceeram]

I did this work after someone on irc needing to map to admin methods, i
know in 3.0 this will all change drasticly, perhaps not add things in 2.x
that will changed again in 3.x. I can close the PR if you'd rather not
implenent this
Op 9 aug. 2012 22:19 schreef "Mark Story" notifications@github.com het
volgende:

Would you want prefixed resource routes without the prefix in the URL? How
does this interact with normal web requests? Seems like in the example of
the tests /posts would actually be an admin method, which isn't clear.
Could we do something smarter like also set the prefix option based on
the routing prefix if the classic prefix option is undefined? That is
similar to the reworked mapResources() + prefixes in 3.0

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/763#issuecomment-7625724.

[markstory]

Well I was more wondering if we could add this and emulate the behavior in 3.0. I think its possible to do so if a routing prefix is provided and the existing prefix option is not used.

[ceeram]

@markstory would that emulating include the static prefix which overrides the plugin prefix in url for 3.0?

[lorenzo]

Are we still interested in supporting this?

[ceeram]

I think it can be closed
Op 22 dec. 2012 23:29 schreef "José Lorenzo Rodríguez" <
notifications@github.com> het volgende:

Are we still interested in supporting this?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/763#issuecomment-11642018.