Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Library sizes are growing: what can we remove from the server? #272

Open
jmoody opened this issue Oct 20, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

Library sizes are growing: what can we remove from the server? #272

jmoody opened this issue Oct 20, 2015 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@jmoody
Copy link
Member

jmoody commented Oct 20, 2015

Motivation

There is a bunch of dead code in the server and the size of the libraries is ballooning.

Please update this list of candidates for removal.

  • LPResources - used by LPKeyboardRoute which itself can be removed
  • LPKeyboardRoute - unused
  • LPReflectUtils - should be replaced by LPInvoker; used in UIAST*
  • LPRecorder - API is no longer supported
  • LPAsyncPlaybackRoute - API is no longer supported
  • LPInterpolationRoute - API is no longer supported
  • LPRecordRoute - API is no longer supported
  • LPAppPropertyRoute - There is no client for this route. At first glance it does key-value coding on the app delegate which is not very useful.
@jmoody jmoody added this to the 0.17.0 milestone Oct 20, 2015
@jmoody jmoody changed the title Code review: what can we remove from the server Code review: what can we remove from the server? The framework is at ~25Mb Oct 20, 2015
@jmoody jmoody changed the title Code review: what can we remove from the server? The framework is at ~25Mb Library sizes are growing: what can we remove from the server? Oct 20, 2015
@jmoody jmoody added task and removed enhancement labels Oct 26, 2015
@jmoody jmoody modified the milestones: on going, 0.17.0 Oct 26, 2015
@jmoody jmoody added epic! and removed task labels Oct 26, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant