We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We could maybe add the possibility to send the message easily like with complete(task())
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@berndruecker While knowing/considering that ...
assertThat(processInstance).isWaitingAt("MessageEvent_1");
... already works, you would probably still like to see something more message oriented ...
assertThat(processInstance).isWaitingForMessage("myMessage");
... where myMessage is ...
<message id="Message_1" name="myMessage"/>
Correct?
Sorry, something went wrong.
docs(ProcessInstanceAssert): document new assertions 'isWaitingFor', …
019c5ae
…'isNotWaitingFor' and helper methods 'send' Affects #29
feat(ProcessEngineTests): create two variants of helper method 'send'…
9b21181
… to easily send messages to specific process instances Affects #29
feat(ProcessInstanceAssert): create new assertion 'isWaitingFor' to v…
a364c7a
…erify process instances Affects #29
87a6ef9
36cd850
…'isNotWaitingFor' Affects #29
865cc3b
feat(ProcessInstanceAssert): create new assertion 'isNotWaitingFor' t…
554dee4
…o verify process instances Closes #29
martinschimak
No branches or pull requests
We could maybe add the possibility to send the message easily like with complete(task())
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: