Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: default to a better raft request timeout #12421

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2023

Conversation

lenaschoenburg
Copy link
Member

Using the old default values of:

zeebe.broker:
  cluster:
    electionTimeout: 2.5s
  raft:
    enablePriorityElection: true
  experimental:
    maxAppendsPerFollower: 2
    raft:
      requestTimeout: 5s

the loss of 2 requests between primary(leader) and secondary(follower) could trigger unnecessary re-election because the secondary would not receive any requests from the primary for at least 5 seconds which exceeds election timeout.

This changes the default request timeout to always match the default election timeout. Using all default values, we get at least one more request attempt between primary and secondary before re-election and probably more, depending on the exact timing when requests are sent.

closes #12009

Using the old default values of:

```yaml
zeebe.broker:
  cluster:
    electionTimeout: 2.5s
  raft:
    enablePriorityElection: true
  experimental:
    maxAppendsPerFollower: 2
    raft:
      requestTimeout: 5s
```

the loss of 2 requests between primary(leader) and secondary(follower)
could trigger unnecessary re-election because the secondary would not
receive any requests from the primary for at least 5 seconds which
exceeds election timeout.

This changes the default request timeout to always match the default
election timeout. Using all default values, we get at least one more
request attempt between primary and secondary before re-election and
probably more, depending on the exact timing when requests are sent.
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Test Results

1 054 files  ±  0  1 054 suites  ±0   2h 3m 19s ⏱️ + 4m 43s
8 444 tests +74  8 418 ✔️ +74  26 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
8 652 runs  +74  8 626 ✔️ +74  26 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit 25a334d. ± Comparison against base commit d1cd172.

This pull request removes 388 and adds 462 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
DmnEvaluationTest If successfully evaluated, the output ‑ Should return a message pack output[6] value={z=[1, 2, 3], x=1, y=true}
io.camunda.zeebe.engine.processing.bpmn.activity.OutputMappingTest ‑ shouldApplyOutputMapping[0: io.camunda.zeebe.model.bpmn.impl.BpmnModelInstanceImpl@6b530032]
io.camunda.zeebe.engine.processing.bpmn.activity.OutputMappingTest ‑ shouldApplyOutputMapping[1: io.camunda.zeebe.model.bpmn.impl.BpmnModelInstanceImpl@23c96bc2]
io.camunda.zeebe.engine.processing.processinstance.CreateProcessInstanceSupportedElementTest ‑ testProcessInstanceCanStartAtElementType[Scenario[type=BUSINESS_RULE_TASK, modelInstance=io.camunda.zeebe.model.bpmn.impl.BpmnModelInstanceImpl@46e587ac, variables={}]]
io.camunda.zeebe.engine.processing.processinstance.CreateProcessInstanceSupportedElementTest ‑ testProcessInstanceCanStartAtElementType[Scenario[type=CALL_ACTIVITY, modelInstance=io.camunda.zeebe.model.bpmn.impl.BpmnModelInstanceImpl@236b77dd, variables={}]]
io.camunda.zeebe.engine.processing.processinstance.CreateProcessInstanceSupportedElementTest ‑ testProcessInstanceCanStartAtElementType[Scenario[type=END_EVENT, modelInstance=io.camunda.zeebe.model.bpmn.impl.BpmnModelInstanceImpl@1227913a, variables={}]]
io.camunda.zeebe.engine.processing.processinstance.CreateProcessInstanceSupportedElementTest ‑ testProcessInstanceCanStartAtElementType[Scenario[type=EVENT_BASED_GATEWAY, modelInstance=io.camunda.zeebe.model.bpmn.impl.BpmnModelInstanceImpl@62197413, variables={correlationKey=value}]]
io.camunda.zeebe.engine.processing.processinstance.CreateProcessInstanceSupportedElementTest ‑ testProcessInstanceCanStartAtElementType[Scenario[type=EVENT_SUB_PROCESS, modelInstance=io.camunda.zeebe.model.bpmn.impl.BpmnModelInstanceImpl@2176b5f6, variables={}]]
io.camunda.zeebe.engine.processing.processinstance.CreateProcessInstanceSupportedElementTest ‑ testProcessInstanceCanStartAtElementType[Scenario[type=EXCLUSIVE_GATEWAY, modelInstance=io.camunda.zeebe.model.bpmn.impl.BpmnModelInstanceImpl@289bfa92, variables={}]]
io.camunda.zeebe.engine.processing.processinstance.CreateProcessInstanceSupportedElementTest ‑ testProcessInstanceCanStartAtElementType[Scenario[type=INTERMEDIATE_CATCH_EVENT, modelInstance=io.camunda.zeebe.model.bpmn.impl.BpmnModelInstanceImpl@78832fd8, variables={correlationKey=value}]]
…
DmnEvaluationTest If successfully evaluated, the output ‑ Should return a message pack output[6] value={z=[1, 2, 3], y=true, x=1}
io.camunda.zeebe.engine.processing.bpmn.activity.OutputMappingTest ‑ shouldApplyOutputMapping[0: io.camunda.zeebe.model.bpmn.impl.BpmnModelInstanceImpl@6aff891f]
io.camunda.zeebe.engine.processing.bpmn.activity.OutputMappingTest ‑ shouldApplyOutputMapping[1: io.camunda.zeebe.model.bpmn.impl.BpmnModelInstanceImpl@3f58e7d5]
io.camunda.zeebe.engine.processing.processinstance.CreateProcessInstanceSupportedElementTest ‑ testProcessInstanceCanStartAtElementType[Scenario[type=BUSINESS_RULE_TASK, modelInstance=io.camunda.zeebe.model.bpmn.impl.BpmnModelInstanceImpl@7ebefdfa, variables={}]]
io.camunda.zeebe.engine.processing.processinstance.CreateProcessInstanceSupportedElementTest ‑ testProcessInstanceCanStartAtElementType[Scenario[type=CALL_ACTIVITY, modelInstance=io.camunda.zeebe.model.bpmn.impl.BpmnModelInstanceImpl@3905229, variables={}]]
io.camunda.zeebe.engine.processing.processinstance.CreateProcessInstanceSupportedElementTest ‑ testProcessInstanceCanStartAtElementType[Scenario[type=END_EVENT, modelInstance=io.camunda.zeebe.model.bpmn.impl.BpmnModelInstanceImpl@4bba628, variables={}]]
io.camunda.zeebe.engine.processing.processinstance.CreateProcessInstanceSupportedElementTest ‑ testProcessInstanceCanStartAtElementType[Scenario[type=EVENT_BASED_GATEWAY, modelInstance=io.camunda.zeebe.model.bpmn.impl.BpmnModelInstanceImpl@5a98983b, variables={correlationKey=value}]]
io.camunda.zeebe.engine.processing.processinstance.CreateProcessInstanceSupportedElementTest ‑ testProcessInstanceCanStartAtElementType[Scenario[type=EVENT_SUB_PROCESS, modelInstance=io.camunda.zeebe.model.bpmn.impl.BpmnModelInstanceImpl@3ad142f0, variables={}]]
io.camunda.zeebe.engine.processing.processinstance.CreateProcessInstanceSupportedElementTest ‑ testProcessInstanceCanStartAtElementType[Scenario[type=EXCLUSIVE_GATEWAY, modelInstance=io.camunda.zeebe.model.bpmn.impl.BpmnModelInstanceImpl@12b0440b, variables={}]]
io.camunda.zeebe.engine.processing.processinstance.CreateProcessInstanceSupportedElementTest ‑ testProcessInstanceCanStartAtElementType[Scenario[type=INTERMEDIATE_CATCH_EVENT, modelInstance=io.camunda.zeebe.model.bpmn.impl.BpmnModelInstanceImpl@59b5251d, variables={correlationKey=value}]]
…

Copy link
Contributor

@deepthidevaki deepthidevaki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @oleschoenburg 💯

@lenaschoenburg
Copy link
Member Author

bors r+

@zeebe-bors-camunda zeebe-bors-camunda bot merged commit ab489d3 into main Apr 14, 2023
25 checks passed
@zeebe-bors-camunda
Copy link
Contributor

Build succeeded:

@zeebe-bors-camunda zeebe-bors-camunda bot deleted the os-raft-request-timeout-default branch April 14, 2023 15:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Default to a shorter raft request timeout
2 participants