Multi-arch docker images (arm64/amd64) #10986
Comments
megglos
added
the
kind/feature
megglos
changed the title
|
Prototype PR to have ARM64 runners for CI: https://github.com/zeebe-io/infra/pull/6. This would simplify building and testing the images, as the prototype above is quite slow when running everything through qemu (and, I would say, more complex). Additionally, you could then extend the existing smoke-test job matrix to include running smoke tests on these. This is slightly out of scope here, since this is testing the local bare metal build, but still has value for macOS contributors. Perhaps a stretch goal, though it's a pretty low hanging fruit, I think. |
|
Maybe not the right place to ask here, but is it also considered to release ARM images for the ui applications like Operate and Optimize? |
|
Hey @akkie, yes that's considered, issues for each of those applications are getting created on each of the repos, e.g. https://github.com/camunda/operate/issues/3674 for Operate. |
megglos
changed the title
11040: ci(smoke-test): multi-arch container smoke test r=megglos a=megglos ## Description Docker builds and smoke tests are only run on Linux machines as building docker containers on macOS and windows runners introduces complexity to the CI setup that we consider not worth the effort: - macOS runners require the setup of [colima as a docker runtime](actions/runner-images#6216) which adds another 1.5-2m to the runtime - on macOS testcontainers failed to detect the docker environment unless [additional environment variables](https://www.testcontainers.org/features/configuration/#customizing-docker-host-detection) have been set - some docker related actions are not supported on windows runners like [`docker/build-push-action`](docker/build-push-action#18 (comment)) - the docker setup on Githubs windows runners seems to be bound to the `windows/amd64` platform, see e.g. this [log](https://github.com/camunda/zeebe/actions/runs/3500015748/jobs/5862231609) Usage of native arm64 runners is listed as a separate sub-task on #10986. ## Related issues closes #11020 Co-authored-by: Meggle (Sebastian Bathke) <sebastian.bathke@camunda.com> Co-authored-by: Sebastian Bathke (Meggle) <sebastian.bathke@camunda.com>
|
Seems like the only open subtask for this ticket is documentation. Is there any way we can preview the arm images while we wait for this ticket to be closed? |
|
The SNAPSHOT images already support both architectures. The next release (8.2.0), scheduled around April, will also have both architectures. I'm not aware of any plans to backport this, but I could be wrong (@megglos will know better) |
|
Thanks for the info! I've modified my |
@namero999 the upcoming 8.2.0-alpha3 release (Jan 9th) already offers arm64 images. |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
See product epic ARM docker images for Camunda 8 - development purposes
Describe the solution you'd like
MUST build & publish arm64 docker images of zeebe using a multi-arch build producing
linux/amd64andlinux/arm64.SHOULD images for each architecture are at least smoke tested to ensure they are operational
Describe alternatives you've considered
none
Breakdown
deploy-docker-snapshotto build and deploy multi-arch images for amd64 and arm64Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: