Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add initial content for explanantion/development process #54

Closed

Conversation

dviererbe
Copy link
Collaborator

@dviererbe dviererbe commented May 2, 2024

Important

This PR is targeted against #53 for better readability of the diff. Set the base to the 2.0-preview branch before merging!

This PR adds the initial content for the explanation article of the Ubuntu development process.

@dviererbe dviererbe added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label May 2, 2024
@dviererbe dviererbe added this to the 2.0 Release milestone May 2, 2024
@dviererbe dviererbe requested review from rkratky and s-makin May 2, 2024 15:40
@dviererbe dviererbe self-assigned this May 2, 2024
dviererbe added a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2024
dviererbe added a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@s-makin s-makin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the delay in my review, this fell off my radar with the sprint. Mainly US -> UK spelling and de-capitalising headers, although I have a couple of other questions/suggestions as well. I don't know if we're still using US spelling in the Packaging Guide, but if we are there are some spellings that will need to go from UK to US (you've got a mixture of both in here :D)

docs/explanation/development-process.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/explanation/development-process.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/explanation/development-process.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/explanation/development-process.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/explanation/development-process.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/explanation/development-process.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/explanation/development-process.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/explanation/development-process.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/explanation/development-process.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/explanation/development-process.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
@dviererbe dviererbe force-pushed the explanation/merges-and-syncs branch from ba593a1 to 9b95e0c Compare July 8, 2024 11:37
dviererbe added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2024
@dviererbe dviererbe force-pushed the explanation/merges-and-syncs branch from 9b95e0c to 6741ace Compare July 8, 2024 12:03
@dviererbe dviererbe closed this Jul 8, 2024
@dviererbe dviererbe deleted the explanantion/development-process branch July 8, 2024 12:26
@dviererbe
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Note

This PR got closed, because I fixed a spelling mistake in the branch name. See #62 for the continuation of this PR.

dviererbe added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2024
See #54

Co-authored-by: Sally Makin <sally.makin@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Viererbe <dominik.viererbe@canonical.com>
dviererbe added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2024
Incorporates feedback from Sally Makin <sally.makin@canonical.com>:
> It's not quite clear what the definition of a freeze is here.
> I think we could be a bit more explicit about what we mean by
> "freeze", to avoid using the term without making it really clear
> what the term means.
See:
- #54 (comment)
- #62 (comment)
- #62 (comment)

Signed-off-by: Dominik Viererbe <dominik.viererbe@canonical.com>
dviererbe added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2024
Incorporates feedback from Sally Makin <sally.makin@canonical.com>:
> It's not quite clear what the definition of a freeze is here.
> I think we could be a bit more explicit about what we mean by
> "freeze", to avoid using the term without making it really clear
> what the term means.
See:
- #54 (comment)
- #62 (comment)
- #62 (comment)

Signed-off-by: Dominik Viererbe <dominik.viererbe@canonical.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants