WIP: Topology definition #31
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
By making a contribution to this repository, I agree to the terms indicated on this repository
I wanted to start building out a definition of our topology based on the discussions in #4 and #19 and #24.
To help us define the number and types of aggregation levels, I started drafting what these levels might look like for U.S. grids. However, these levels might change in other regions, so I invite others who are more familiar with those structures (@gwpicard) to add to the level granularity table for other regions (and also refine the US column as well).
I also started defining what the edges between levels and among elements of each level would look like, and what kind of data we might need about each edge.