Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/add meta to cardano type and epoch aggregations #62

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 1, 2019

Conversation

rhyslbw
Copy link
Contributor

@rhyslbw rhyslbw commented Oct 31, 2019

This PR includes the information required for the client to perform calculations determining the current slot in the epoch, and the total slots to expect in the epoch via simple calculations. This is the better alternative rather than offering subscriptions

@rhyslbw rhyslbw added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 31, 2019
@rhyslbw rhyslbw added this to the 0.3.0 milestone Oct 31, 2019
@Sam-Jeston Sam-Jeston merged commit 98ed16c into develop Nov 1, 2019
@Sam-Jeston Sam-Jeston deleted the feature/add-meta-to-cardano-type branch November 1, 2019 00:16
rvl pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2020
62: Use hackage releases of libs, and downgrade to lts-13.26 r=dcoutts a=dcoutts

Use the new hackage releases of cborg and canonical-json.

Downgrade from stackage lts-13.28 to lts-13.26. No dependent packages were actually using this because the nix setup isn't ready for it yet.

Downgrading to match reality makes it easier for our tools (cardano-repo-tool) to generate the right info. The tool uses the stackage snapshot from this repo for the generated snapshot for all other repos. So it's really helpful if this one is a working one, otherwise the generated stuff has to be edited by hand.

Co-authored-by: Duncan Coutts <duncan@well-typed.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Peyton Jones <michael.peyton-jones@iohk.io>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants