Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue 119: Test for concept-membership of used design vocabularies #120

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 18, 2022

Conversation

ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Member

@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist commented Oct 26, 2022

This Pull Request resolves all requirements of Issue #119 .

Coordination

  • Pull Request is against correct branch
  • Pull Request is in, or reverted to, Draft status before Solutions Approval vote has passed.
  • CI passes in CASE feature branch
  • CI passes in CASE current unstable branch tracking UCO's unstable as submodule (3ac5480)
  • Impact on SHACL validation reviewed for CASE-Examples
  • Impact on SHACL validation remediated for CASE-Examples (N/A)
  • Impact on SHACL validation reviewed for casework.github.io
  • Impact on SHACL validation remediated for casework.github.io (N/A)
  • Milestone linked
  • Solutions Approval vote logged on corresponding Issue (once logged, can be taken out of Draft PR status)
  • PR 117 is merged.

References:
* #119

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <alexander.nelson@nist.gov>
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist marked this pull request as ready for review November 18, 2022 21:07
@b0bkaT b0bkaT merged commit 9922288 into develop Nov 18, 2022
@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist deleted the Feature-Issue-119 branch March 28, 2023 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

CASE usage of upstream design vocabularies needs a typo checker
2 participants