Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

b-tagging first improvements -- need to check #15

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Jul 11, 2016

Conversation

lucastorterotot
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

thus this may not be correct for large impact parameters (more than 3 mm)
It also computes W, the likelihood value for the jet to contain beauty,
using a likelihood ratio method for each particle in the jet.
Computes TCHE and TCHP for the jet for b-tagging'''
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this documentation lacks information about module configuration, please provide an example configuration here as done for other analyzers.

also, the documentation should say what is going to be added to each track, e.g.
track.IP : impact parameter in mm
track.dIP : impact parameter uncertainty in mm

in the same way, the documentation should say what is going to be added to each jet.

primary vertex, with respets to the primary vertex

New attributes for particles.path (from compute_theta_0) :
* theta_0 = 1/sqrt(2) * gaussian width of the scattering angle
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not clear, please add a reference to the equation of theta 0 in the pdg

@cbernet cbernet merged commit ada2334 into cbernet:master Jul 11, 2016
selvaggi pushed a commit to selvaggi/heppy that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2016
working with new edm. tutorial reviewed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants