You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Andrew proposes axioms like alpha, which just check equivalence without beta-reduction of two terms (eta-expansion too?); and also a one-step reduction proof.
Chris proposes a directional form of beta, which asserts that the lhs of the equation reduces to something alpha-equivalent to the rhs.
Note that the first group of these need to be added to Cedille Core, too.
Also, we should support the Kleene trick for these.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
After discussion in a Cedille Developer meeting we decided that because some of these axioms would require changes to Cedille Core that we're going to shelve it for the time being.
Andrew proposes axioms like alpha, which just check equivalence without beta-reduction of two terms (eta-expansion too?); and also a one-step reduction proof.
Chris proposes a directional form of beta, which asserts that the lhs of the equation reduces to something alpha-equivalent to the rhs.
Note that the first group of these need to be added to Cedille Core, too.
Also, we should support the Kleene trick for these.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: