Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add type annotation to celery/utils/iso8601.py #8750

Merged

Conversation

em1le
Copy link
Contributor

@em1le em1le commented Jan 3, 2024

Relates to #7394

@em1le em1le changed the title add type annotation add type annotation to celery/utils/iso8601.py Jan 3, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (7a27725) 87.24% compared to head (8e95a97) 87.33%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8750      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.24%   87.33%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         148      148              
  Lines       18637    18523     -114     
  Branches     3199     3165      -34     
==========================================
- Hits        16260    16177      -83     
+ Misses       2080     2060      -20     
+ Partials      297      286      -11     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 87.30% <100.00%> (+0.08%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@em1le em1le marked this pull request as ready for review January 3, 2024 16:34
@Nusnus Nusnus merged commit be61f8f into celery:main Jan 3, 2024
33 checks passed
@em1le em1le mentioned this pull request Jan 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants