Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EAP 6.2.1 #23

Closed
fcorneli opened this issue Feb 16, 2014 · 5 comments
Closed

EAP 6.2.1 #23

fcorneli opened this issue Feb 16, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@fcorneli
Copy link
Collaborator

Seems like EAP 6.2.1 is available. Here you might want to copy the repositories section from EAP 6.2 parent pom.xml before compiling.

@hasalex
Copy link
Collaborator

hasalex commented Feb 17, 2014

Thanks for the input, Franck. I didn't it.
I'm just seeing that the file name of the repository has changed.
I'll support it very soon.

hasalex added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 18, 2014
@hasalex hasalex closed this as completed Feb 18, 2014
@fcorneli
Copy link
Collaborator Author

That was fast. :) BTW: did you notice that RedHat has reserved centas.org? Seems like they are afraid for a second CentOS episode.

If one would remove all JBoss/RedHat branding (to not to run into trademark issues; copyright is already covered via the LGPL) you could redistribute the binary yourself.

@hasalex
Copy link
Collaborator

hasalex commented Feb 18, 2014

Long discussions have already occured on this subject, on forums. The patch is much easier to prepare with the 6.2 version than the previous ones. This is cool. As far as the patch is easy to run, there's no reason to go to a CentAS-like project.
And it would be ugly to start such a project now in 2014, when RH is starting to contribute to CentOS.

@eis
Copy link

eis commented Feb 18, 2014

Might want to update the readme file as well, about supporting 6.2.1 and defaulting to it. Or I can make a pr for it.

@hasalex
Copy link
Collaborator

hasalex commented Feb 18, 2014

Oh yes. I forgot this one. Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants