New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rename: Connectors -> LiquidityPools #1493
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. I think the instance terminology makes sense!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we don't want to start from scratch on the Liquidity Pools Testnet, we unfortunately need to write a simple migration to map all Connectors
prefixed storage items to LiquidityPools
.
Apart from that only ridiculous nitpicks from my side which don't need to apply and, of course, lots of praise and love. Thanks for applying this and all the improvements! Much better than before.
runtime/integration-tests/src/liquidity_pools/pallet/development/tests/liquidity_pools.rs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@wischli thanks for the careful review and raising awareness for specific core bits. I believe to have addressed all of your comments, let me know if I missed any 🏄♂️ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! 🤿
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
There are some leftover artifacts in the Liquidity-Pools lib.rs
but no blocker.
a9bf993
@mustermeiszer @wischli I had to merge |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Re-approving
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Re-approve
* rename: Connectors -> LiquidityPools * Apply review comments
Closes #1489
Notes
I tried to rename "connectors" to "liquidityPools" 1:1 as much as possible but in certain cases that didn't make a lot of sense. For example, when adding a "known connector", I rephrased that as "instance", since "known liquidity pool" is not quite right in my pov. Happy to be told otherwise.