Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

jewel: TestLibRBD.DiscardAfterWrite doesn't handle rbd_skip_partial_discard = true #11853

Merged
1 commit merged into from Nov 11, 2016
Merged

jewel: TestLibRBD.DiscardAfterWrite doesn't handle rbd_skip_partial_discard = true #11853

1 commit merged into from Nov 11, 2016

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Nov 9, 2016

Fixes: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17750
Signed-off-by: Jason Dillaman <dillaman@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 20406ae)
@ghost ghost self-assigned this Nov 9, 2016
@ghost ghost added this to the jewel milestone Nov 9, 2016
@ghost ghost added bug-fix rbd labels Nov 9, 2016
@ghost ghost changed the base branch from jewel to jewel-next November 9, 2016 15:26
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Nov 9, 2016

jenkins test this please (general jenkins failure)

ghost pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2016
…t handle rbd_skip_partial_discard = true

Reviewed-by: Loic Dachary <ldachary@redhat.com>
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Nov 11, 2016

@trociny does this backport look good to merge ? It passed the rbd suite http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17851#note-2

@ghost ghost assigned trociny Nov 11, 2016
Copy link
Contributor

@trociny trociny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@ghost ghost merged commit 154fb74 into ceph:jewel-next Nov 11, 2016
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
1 participant