Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

qa/suites/upgrade/luminous-x #17160

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Sep 1, 2017

Conversation

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@yuriw
Copy link
Contributor

commented Aug 22, 2017

Signed-off-by: Yuri Weinstein yweinste@redhat.com

@yuriw yuriw requested a review from jdurgin Aug 22, 2017

@yuriw

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

commented Aug 22, 2017

@jdurgin ps take a look and I will give it a try

@yuriw yuriw force-pushed the wip-luminous-x-master branch 2 times, most recently from e116604 to 6a3089c Aug 23, 2017

Initial check in luminous-x suite
Signed-off-by: Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com>

@yuriw yuriw force-pushed the wip-luminous-x-master branch from 6a3089c to 304b492 Aug 23, 2017

meta:
- desc: |
Run ceph on two nodes,
with a separate client 0,1,2 third node.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@amitkumar50

amitkumar50 Aug 26, 2017

Contributor

@yuriw 0,1,2 third shouldn't be something '0th, 1st, 2nd and 3rd`

- overall HEALTH_
conf:
global:
enable experimental unrecoverable data corrupting features: "*"

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@amitkumar50

amitkumar50 Aug 26, 2017

Contributor

@yuriw I feel should be corruption instead of corrupting.
What your thoughts?

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@yuriw

yuriw Aug 29, 2017

Author Contributor

@amitkumar50 I actually don't know :(

@liewegas

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Aug 29, 2017

I have a parallel attempt in #17247

@liewegas liewegas closed this Aug 29, 2017

@liewegas liewegas deleted the wip-luminous-x-master branch Aug 29, 2017

@liewegas liewegas restored the wip-luminous-x-master branch Aug 29, 2017

@liewegas

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Aug 29, 2017

Sorry, I was thinking the rados one. Reopening!

@liewegas liewegas reopened this Aug 29, 2017

@liewegas liewegas changed the title Initial check in luminous-x suite qa/suites/upgrade/luminous-x Aug 29, 2017

@liewegas
Copy link
Member

left a comment

lgtm

Initial check in
Signed-off-by: Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com>

@yuriw yuriw force-pushed the wip-luminous-x-master branch from 6d6ebeb to aff3426 Sep 1, 2017

@jdurgin

jdurgin approved these changes Sep 1, 2017

@jdurgin jdurgin merged commit 317a8ba into master Sep 1, 2017

5 checks passed

Docs: build check OK - docs built
Details
Signed-off-by all commits in this PR are signed
Details
Unmodified Submodules submodules for project are unmodified
Details
make check make check succeeded
Details
make check (arm64) make check succeeded
Details

@jdurgin jdurgin deleted the wip-luminous-x-master branch Sep 1, 2017

@jdurgin jdurgin removed the needs-backport label Sep 1, 2017

yuriw added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2017

Initial check in luminous-x suite
same from master #17160

Signed-off-by: Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.