doc: add example of setting pool in cephfs layout #17372
Conversation
doc/cephfs/file-layouts.rst
Outdated
| .. code-block:: bash | ||
|
|
||
| $ mkdir /mnt/cephfs/myecdir | ||
| $ setfattr -n ceph.dir.layout.pool -v cephfs_data_ssd /mnt/cephfs/myecdir |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unrelated to this doc change -- but do we need a process to auto-tag the data pool as being owned by CephFS when this attribute is set?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nope, somebody called "Jason" already updated add_data_pool's implementation to add the tag. Smart guy!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank goodness -- just wanted to ensure there was no magic backdoor of config settings.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think you should reconcile the original doc using cephfs_data_ssd pool name with your intent here to document EC pools via the myecdirfolder name.
Pick one, or duplicate for both?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fair point, head was in two places. Updated.
jcsp
force-pushed
the
wip-doc-cephfs-pools
branch
from
b446183
to
b77db8c
Compare
doc/cephfs/file-layouts.rst
Outdated
|
|
||
| All new files created within that directory will now inherit its layout and place their data in your newly added pool. | ||
|
|
||
| You may notice that object counts in your primary data pool (the one passed to `fs new`) continue to increase, even if files are being created in the pool you added. This is normal: the file data is stored in the pool specified by the layout, but a small amount of metadata is kept in the primary data pool for all files. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
if "fs new" is meant to be displayed in a mono-spaced font then double backticks are needed (vs. single ones)
Signed-off-by: John Spray <john.spray@redhat.com>
jcsp
force-pushed
the
wip-doc-cephfs-pools
branch
from
b77db8c
to
dee090e
Compare
Signed-off-by: John Spray john.spray@redhat.com