-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
mon: handle monitor lag when killing mgrs #18268
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i don't think we should be so generous to update all mgr's beacon timestamps. instead, i think we might want to use
last_tick + mgr_tick_period - mgr_beacon_grace
as the value ofcutoff
to offset some of the time because of our own fault (slowness).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, the idea is that if we have gone slow, then there are probably MgrBeacon messages queued up on peons waiting to be sent through -- the idea of resetting the last_beacons to now is that we will then be giving them mgr_beacon_grace to forward those beacons (assuming they should come soon, now that the mons are back online).
If we used an offset of
(now - last_tick) - mgr_tick_period
to account for the slowness with a specific number of seconds, then we would only be accounting for that this time throughtick()
, and we would then be strict again next time throughtick
-- the effect would be to only allow mgr_tick_period to receive the next beacons, instead of mgr_beacon_grace.Because we see this behaviour on systems that are slow/laggy, I think it's better to use the more generous approach to allow for peons that are also being slow to forward messages after the cluster recovers (they're swapping a lot or something).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ahh, right! thanks for your explanation. makes sense to me. the next time when the laggy mon ticks, the innocent mgr(s) won't survive when the fix proposed by me. but they will with your fix.