qa/tasks/thrashosds: set min_in default to 4 #18670
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
all commits in this PR are signed |
We have EC tests with k=2,m=2, so we need a min of 4. Fixes: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21997 Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
liewegas
force-pushed
the
wip-min-in-4
branch
from
69a9fff
to
d21809b
Compare
|
all commits in this PR are signed |
|
submodules for project are unmodified |
1 similar comment
|
submodules for project are unmodified |
|
OK - docs built |
|
make check succeeded |
3 similar comments
|
make check succeeded |
|
make check succeeded |
|
make check succeeded |
tchaikov
approved these changes
Nov 2, 2017
|
backport to luminous #18702 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We have EC tests with k=2,m=2, so we need a min of 4. See
/a/sage-2017-11-01_01:03:53-rados-wip-sage2-testing-2017-10-31-1354-distro-basic-smithi/1797020
for an example of a test that fails without it.
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21997