Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

rados: use WaitInterval()'s return value instead of manual timing #20028

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 22, 2018
Merged

rados: use WaitInterval()'s return value instead of manual timing #20028

merged 1 commit into from Jan 22, 2018

Conversation

mogeb
Copy link
Contributor

@mogeb mogeb commented Jan 19, 2018

Signed-off-by: Mohamad Gebai mgebai@suse.com

@mogeb
rados: use WaitInterval()'s return value instead of manual timing
6d4d26f 
Signed-off-by: Mohamad Gebai <mgebai@suse.com>
@mogeb
Copy link
Contributor Author

mogeb commented Jan 19, 2018

As part of moving away from the real time clock for measuring time passage.

@liewegas
Copy link
Member

http://pulpito.ceph.com/sage-2018-01-22_16:28:42-rados-wip-sage3-testing-2018-01-22-0845-distro-basic-smithi/

@liewegas liewegas merged commit 6f7e54d into ceph:master Jan 22, 2018
@mogeb mogeb deleted the steady-clock-rados branch January 23, 2018 01:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@liewegas liewegas liewegas approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
cleanup core needs-qa wip-sage3-testing
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
2 participants
@mogeb @liewegas