Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mimic: mds: add magic to header of open file table #22841

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 9, 2018

Conversation

pdvian
Copy link

@pdvian pdvian commented Jul 4, 2018

Fixes: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/24240
Signed-off-by: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit c60d55d)

Conflicts:
	src/mds/OpenFileTable.cc: Resolved in _load_finish
@smithfarm smithfarm added this to the mimic milestone Jul 4, 2018
@smithfarm smithfarm added the cephfs Ceph File System label Jul 4, 2018
@smithfarm smithfarm requested review from ukernel and batrick July 4, 2018 09:56
@smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor

Conflict resolution looks good to me.

@smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor

Alternatively we could cherry-pick 94e4928 (the absence of which causes the conflict) first, since it appears to be a cleanup commit that will cause lots of conflicts throughout the mimic release cycle if we don't cherry-pick it now.

What does anybody think about that idea?

@smithfarm smithfarm requested a review from tchaikov July 4, 2018 10:13
@smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor

(Bringing in @tchaikov to comment on the idea presented in the previous comment.)

@tchaikov
Copy link
Contributor

tchaikov commented Jul 5, 2018

@smithfarm we can not single out 94e4928 and only cherry pick that very commit, as it depends on #22015, which is a massive but relatively simple change . i am good either way. but in long term, it might be advisable to backport #22015 for easier mimic backport .

@yuriw
Copy link
Contributor

yuriw commented Jul 6, 2018

@yuriw yuriw merged commit 5592299 into ceph:mimic Jul 9, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
6 participants