Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

osdc: fix the ENOCONN normalization in Objecter::_linger_reconnect() #49462

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 24, 2024

Conversation

rzarzynski
Copy link
Contributor

Problem's description: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/53789#note-12

Fixes: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/53789
Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski rzarzyns@redhat.com

Contribution Guidelines

Checklist

  • Tracker (select at least one)
    • References tracker ticket
    • Very recent bug; references commit where it was introduced
    • New feature (ticket optional)
    • Doc update (no ticket needed)
    • Code cleanup (no ticket needed)
  • Component impact
    • Affects Dashboard, opened tracker ticket
    • Affects Orchestrator, opened tracker ticket
    • No impact that needs to be tracked
  • Documentation (select at least one)
    • Updates relevant documentation
    • No doc update is appropriate
  • Tests (select at least one)
Show available Jenkins commands
  • jenkins retest this please
  • jenkins test classic perf
  • jenkins test crimson perf
  • jenkins test signed
  • jenkins test make check
  • jenkins test make check arm64
  • jenkins test submodules
  • jenkins test dashboard
  • jenkins test dashboard cephadm
  • jenkins test api
  • jenkins test docs
  • jenkins render docs
  • jenkins test ceph-volume all
  • jenkins test ceph-volume tox
  • jenkins test windows

@rzarzynski
Copy link
Contributor Author

jenkins test api

Copy link
Contributor

@adamemerson adamemerson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity for 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs for another 30 days.
If you are a maintainer or core committer, please follow-up on this pull request to identify what steps should be taken by the author to move this proposed change forward.
If you are the author of this pull request, thank you for your proposed contribution. If you believe this change is still appropriate, please ensure that any feedback has been addressed and ask for a code review.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jul 27, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically closed because there has been no activity for 90 days. Please feel free to reopen this pull request (or open a new one) if the proposed change is still appropriate. Thank you for your contribution!

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Aug 26, 2023
@rzarzynski rzarzynski reopened this Aug 28, 2023
@rzarzynski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@yuri, @ljflores: ping.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale label Aug 28, 2023
@ljflores
Copy link
Contributor

ljflores commented Oct 9, 2023

@rzarzynski not sure how I missed this; it will be included in the next QA run.

@rzarzynski
Copy link
Contributor Author

No worries :-).

Copy link

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity for 60 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs for another 30 days.
If you are a maintainer or core committer, please follow-up on this pull request to identify what steps should be taken by the author to move this proposed change forward.
If you are the author of this pull request, thank you for your proposed contribution. If you believe this change is still appropriate, please ensure that any feedback has been addressed and ask for a code review.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Dec 10, 2023
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2024

This pull request has been automatically closed because there has been no activity for 90 days. Please feel free to reopen this pull request (or open a new one) if the proposed change is still appropriate. Thank you for your contribution!

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Jan 9, 2024
@ljflores ljflores reopened this Jan 9, 2024
@ljflores ljflores removed the stale label Jan 9, 2024
@ljflores
Copy link
Contributor

ljflores commented Jan 9, 2024

Got missed again! Think because it was missing a core label.

@yuriw
Copy link
Contributor

yuriw commented Jan 22, 2024

jenkins test make check

@yuriw
Copy link
Contributor

yuriw commented Jan 22, 2024

@rzarzynski this PR is ready for merge after checks passed
ref: https://trello.com/c/6oYH6qSe

@ljflores ljflores merged commit cd2edcf into ceph:main Jan 24, 2024
13 of 16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
5 participants