Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tools/ceph_monstore_tool: additional commands and doc #52855

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 13, 2023

Conversation

Matan-B
Copy link
Contributor

@Matan-B Matan-B commented Aug 7, 2023

Added:

Contribution Guidelines

Checklist

  • Tracker (select at least one)
    • References tracker ticket
    • Very recent bug; references commit where it was introduced
    • New feature (ticket optional)
    • Doc update (no ticket needed)
    • Code cleanup (no ticket needed)
  • Component impact
    • Affects Dashboard, opened tracker ticket
    • Affects Orchestrator, opened tracker ticket
    • No impact that needs to be tracked
  • Documentation (select at least one)
    • Updates relevant documentation
    • No doc update is appropriate
  • Tests (select at least one)
Show available Jenkins commands
  • jenkins retest this please
  • jenkins test classic perf
  • jenkins test crimson perf
  • jenkins test signed
  • jenkins test make check
  • jenkins test make check arm64
  • jenkins test submodules
  • jenkins test dashboard
  • jenkins test dashboard cephadm
  • jenkins test api
  • jenkins test docs
  • jenkins render docs
  • jenkins test ceph-volume all
  • jenkins test ceph-volume tox
  • jenkins test windows

@zdover23
Copy link
Contributor

zdover23 commented Aug 7, 2023

@Matan-B: I can't approve PRs that contain code changes, but if you separate out the docs updates from the code changes and raise a PR that contains only these docs changes, I can fix the docs so that they can pass the build check.

Copy link
Contributor

@NitzanMordhai NitzanMordhai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't it better to return the ret from clear_key? Isn't it more informative than 1 ?

@Matan-B Matan-B force-pushed the wip-matanb-monstore-osd_snap branch from 6c7fc76 to 0f85b38 Compare August 7, 2023 12:36
@Matan-B Matan-B requested review from NitzanMordhai and a team and removed request for a team August 7, 2023 12:40
@Matan-B Matan-B mentioned this pull request Aug 7, 2023
14 tasks
@rzarzynski rzarzynski self-requested a review August 7, 2023 14:55
Copy link
Contributor

@NitzanMordhai NitzanMordhai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Matan-B Matan-B requested a review from batrick August 22, 2023 12:51
@Matan-B
Copy link
Contributor Author

Matan-B commented Aug 22, 2023

@batrick Does this PR require qa or is it good to go?

@batrick
Copy link
Member

batrick commented Sep 1, 2023

@batrick Does this PR require qa or is it good to go?

Yes, it requires QA. I'm not the mon maintainer though. Run it by core folks.

src/mon/MonitorDBStore.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/tools/ceph_monstore_tool.cc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/tools/ceph_monstore_tool.cc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/tools/ceph_monstore_tool.cc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/tools/ceph_monstore_tool.cc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Matan-B Matan-B removed the needs-qa label Sep 19, 2023
Signed-off-by: Matan Breizman <mbreizma@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Matan Breizman <mbreizma@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Matan Breizman <mbreizma@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Matan Breizman <mbreizma@redhat.com>
@Matan-B Matan-B force-pushed the wip-matanb-monstore-osd_snap branch from 8e6bbb3 to 42f94dd Compare October 9, 2023 13:47
@yuriw yuriw merged commit c2d216b into ceph:main Nov 13, 2023
10 of 11 checks passed
@zdover23
Copy link
Contributor

@yuriw: Can the docs-related parts of this PR be backported to both Reef and Quincy?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
9 participants