Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build/ops: ceph.spec.in: useless %py_requires breaks SLE11-SP3 build #5412

Merged
1 commit merged into from Aug 30, 2015

Conversation

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor

smithfarm commented Jul 29, 2015

ceph.spec.in: drop SUSE-specific %py_requires macro
%py_requires expands to

BuildRequires: /usr/bin/python
PreReq: python = 2.7

The BuildRequires: is already provided, and the PreReq is wrong because
e.g. SLE11-SP3 (a platform we are trying to support) has Python 2.6.

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12351 Fixes: #12351

Signed-off-by: Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.com>
(cherry picked from commit cbf6c7b)

@smithfarm smithfarm self-assigned this Jul 29, 2015

@smithfarm smithfarm added this to the hammer milestone Jul 29, 2015

@ghost

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

ghost commented Aug 30, 2015

Pass http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12701#ceph-deploy http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12701#upgrade (there are job failures but they are unrelated to packaging)

ghost pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 30, 2015

Loic Dachary
Merge pull request #5412 from SUSE/wip-12448-hammer
ceph.spec.in: useless %py_requires breaks SLE11-SP3 build

Reviewed-by: Loic Dachary <ldachary@redhat.com>

@ghost ghost merged commit 2044f3c into ceph:hammer Aug 30, 2015

@smithfarm smithfarm added build/ops and removed core labels Sep 3, 2015

@smithfarm smithfarm deleted the SUSE:wip-12448-hammer branch Sep 5, 2015

@ghost ghost changed the title ceph.spec.in: useless %py_requires breaks SLE11-SP3 build build/ops: ceph.spec.in: useless %py_requires breaks SLE11-SP3 build Sep 13, 2015

This issue was closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.