Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Inconsistent section references in revision history #13

Closed
rhattersley opened this issue Jul 26, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Inconsistent section references in revision history #13

rhattersley opened this issue Jul 26, 2015 · 2 comments
Milestone
1.6

Comments

@rhattersley
Copy link
Member

Appendix G, Revision History contains two different styles of section reference:

Section 3.5, "Flags"

and

the section called "Azimuthal equidistant"

Do we care about preserving this difference? Would it be OK if all the section references followed the first style, as elsewhere in the document?
@rhattersley rhattersley changed the title Inconsistent section references Inconsistent section references in revision history Jul 26, 2015
@rhattersley rhattersley mentioned this issue Jul 26, 2015
Closed
20 tasks
@davidhassell
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Richard,

I favour keeping the inconsistencies as they are for the 1.6 document. This will, in general, make checking the veracity easier. If there is a will to tidy this up in the future (e.g. for 1.7) then it can go in as a defect ticket in the usual fashion.

Thanks,
David

@rhattersley
Copy link
Member Author

The ability to use explicit/custom link text has been added to asciidoctor master.

This was referenced Nov 22, 2015
Closed
Merged
Closed
@marqh marqh closed this as completed in #39 Nov 24, 2015
@rhattersley rhattersley modified the milestone: 1.6 Nov 25, 2015
dblodgett-usgs added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 20, 2019
@dblodgett-usgs
Merge pull request #13 from cf-convention/dblodgett-usgs-issue-templates
26dc6af 
Dblodgett usgs issue templates
davidhassell added a commit to davidhassell/cf-conventions that referenced this issue Jan 13, 2021
@davidhassell @AndersMS
example formatting, style, and spelling (cf-convention#13)
c323728 
* more text following 2020-11-27 discussions

* bounds

* tidy

* tidy

* tidy

* tidy

* reproducability

* offset

* indices

* indices

* indices

* super

* tie_point_dimension (1)

* tie_point_dimension (2)

* tie_point_dimension (3)

* tie_point_dimension (4)

* tie point

* tie_point_dimension (5)

* corrected interpolation_configuration description

* zone/area rewording

* zone/area rewording

* multiple mappings

* multiple mappings

* multiple mappings

* typos and some minor rewording suggestions

* format

* spell check

* markup style

* example formatting

* example formatting

* example formatting

* example formatting

Co-authored-by: AndersMS <63056394+AndersMS@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.6
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rhattersley @davidhassell