Simple correction to Example 6.1.2

[larsbarring]

I have just come across a suggested correction in PR cf-convention/cf-convention.github.io#216 by @Fred-Leclercq. Basically he notes that in the example the standard name does not exists and suggests an alternative, i.e. the following change:

abundance:standard_name = "number_concentration_of_organisms_in_taxon_in_sea_water" ;
abundance:standard_name = "number_concentration_of_biological_taxon_in_sea_water" ;

As I have no insight into this subject area, could some else have a look? Moreover, it might be easier to create a new PR using the current draft (and then in this repo) rather than trying to update the current one in the other repo.

ping @JonathanGregory (as you might know yourself, or know who has the right expertise)

[davidhassell]

Hi Lars,

I wrote PR #219 that put that in :) and think that @Fred-Leclercq's analysis is correct - the standard name in the example should be number_concentration_of_biological_taxon_in_sea_water, as introduced by @roy-lowry in cf-convention/discuss#27. We should close cf-convention/cf-convention.github.io#216 (as it suggests a change to an actual published version) and create a new PR here, as you suggest.

[JonathanGregory]

I agree. Thanks, both.

[larsbarring]

OK, I will prepare a PR.

[larsbarring]

Hi David @davidhassell I put you as reviewer of the PR. As the PR takes care of a simple correction I suggest that it can be merged ass soon as it is accepted.

[larsbarring]

Closed as completed via PR #492