New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove Google static map feature #7332
Comments
I could not find that the offering is stopped. I assume that the free limit |
Thats correct and this limit is per key, not per user. |
I mean a limit per device controlled by c:geo. |
We could circumvent this by giving the user a way to enter their own key. But IMHO users who are able (and willing) to apply for their own Google Maps API key would be fit enough to install an OSM offline map as well (and by this avoiding the problem completely). |
The problem is not only the key "as such" - you have to specify a bank account. |
Yes, I know. And you can't even set a limit to always stay within the "free" limit. That's why I have switched my web projects away from Google Maps during the last months. |
We discussed this some time ago, when we had to remove OpenCycleMap and decided against it. Maybe OK for some real "teccy" users, but IMHO not suitable for Google Maps...or do you know any other app, which requires users to add a bank account to their Google account and generate keys, etc. |
You can't even get a v1 key anymore. ;) |
In today's master static maps generation is only disabled to get the version out to market. |
Google stopped offering static maps for free. This is the reason, why the feature stopped working in c:geo. Details can be found here: #7150
The non working feature should be removed from c:geo as I don't expect Google to change its mind or c:geo team to be able to pay for such maps.
An alternative source (if there is any) could be implemented at the same step or afterwards.
Please be aware:
Currently all user installations will still send request to Google for static maps as the feature is still in and the default value is "Active". So removing it, might also a bit increase the performance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: