Update get-func-name to the latest version 馃殌 #915
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![greenkeeper[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/505?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Version 2.0.0 of get-func-name just got published.
The version 2.0.0 is not covered by your current version range.
Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.
I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of get-func-name.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.
Commits
The new version differs by 18 commits .
fbd5eb5Merge pull request #23 from lucasfcosta/release-return-null-for-non-function04a03f1chore: getFuncName returns null for non function.61280f2Merge pull request #22 from lucasfcosta/return-null-for-non-function-release55a6be4chore: BREAKING CHANGE getFuncName returning null for non-function arguments17268c0Merge pull request #20 from lucasfcosta/return-null-for-non-function19b8940chore: return null when passed a non-function argumentaddc96fMerge pull request #21 from chaijs/remove-lgtm34cfdedDelete MAINTAINERS980422cMerge pull request #19 from chaijs/vieiralucas-patch-19f9ff54Center repo name on READMEb4a20e9Merge pull request #14 from vieiralucas/refact-tests1b721a8chore(test): split single test into multiple tests8ef07efMerge pull request #9 from chaijs/greenkeeper-mocha-3.1.2a87f313chore(package): update mocha to version 3.1.20418a10Merge pull request #12 from lucasfcosta/fix-eslint-versionThere are 18 commits in total. See the full diff.
Not sure how things should work exactly?
There is a collection of frequently asked questions and of course you may always ask my humans.
Your Greenkeeper Bot 馃尨