feat: render table with lipgloss

[bashbunni]

This is still a wip, but making a draft PR so it's easier to get feedback and help debugging along the way.

It seems to spit out the right table most of the time, but I'd still like to...

• remove StyleWriter dep in table
• fix failing test (or understand why it's failing) ansi/TestRendererIssues/46_2
• apply styling to cells and rows
• add margin support

[bashbunni]

I still don't know why the one test is failing, but I've added a basic padded cell style and support text styling for the cells. I wonder if using renderText for styling the text is the best call. It might end up making more sense to have the styling separate from writing so it's easier to amend styles throughout the program.

[bashbunni]

Going to work on margin support in another PR - the scope of this one is just table rendering

[bashbunni]

I believe this is using the Lip Gloss table in its pre-release state, so will need to tidy this up a bit before she's ready 2 rock

[maxmoehl]

I've tested the PR on some of the large tables that I'd like to display with it and it already looks a lot better! However, I noticed that the width is not properly set, this does the trick:

Suggested change

	ctx.table.lipgloss = table.New().StyleFunc(func(row, col int) lipgloss.Style { return cellStyle })
	ctx.table.lipgloss = table.New().
	StyleFunc(func(row, col int) lipgloss.Style { return cellStyle }).
	Width(int(ctx.blockStack.Width(ctx)))

The downside is that it causes columns which contain rows with long text¹ to be truncated or even omitted entirely. I'd prefer if it either wraps text within the cell or the table is printed in full width (which isn't really possible because it seems like glamour cuts off the lines, trying to wrap them?). But this is probably a feature request towards lipgloss and not glamour.

Footnotes

1. If there's 100 empty rows and one with 100 characters the column is more likely to get truncated as explained here. ↩

[gamebox]

Maybe before it's considered perfect you could release this as a TermRendererOption (WithLipglossTableRenderer)? And then when you are satisfied, you can deprecate that option and noop it?