Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Litex example #111

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 18, 2021
Merged

Litex example #111

merged 6 commits into from
Jun 18, 2021

Conversation

acomodi
Copy link
Contributor

@acomodi acomodi commented Dec 21, 2020

This PR is built from #107 and supersedes both #107 and #55.

The main difference with #107 are:

  • removed generated code
  • removed litex generation in the linux_litex example
  • added different kinds of CPU types
  • adds riscv64 unkown elfe conda package from litex-hub

@acomodi acomodi force-pushed the litex-example branch 4 times, most recently from 21dcb9d to 7dabd55 Compare December 21, 2020 14:25
@rw1nkler rw1nkler mentioned this pull request Dec 22, 2020
1 task
xc7/litex_demo/README.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
xc7/litex_demo/arty.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@acomodi acomodi requested a review from kgugala January 4, 2021 11:20
fkokosinski and others added 6 commits June 18, 2021 09:31
Signed-off-by: Filip Kokosinski <fkokosinski@antmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Comodi <acomodi@antmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Comodi <acomodi@antmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Comodi <acomodi@antmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Comodi <acomodi@antmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Comodi <acomodi@antmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alessandro Comodi <acomodi@antmicro.com>
Copy link
Member

@kgugala kgugala left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants