Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Basic command line options enhancement #3

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Mar 30, 2015
Merged

Conversation

ulfbert-inc
Copy link
Contributor

  1. Build result added to .gitignore
  2. Option names changed
  3. Added --port option

@@ -33,7 +33,8 @@ CTOP is a tool which allows you to quickly find out what's happening on a machin
* Metrics are for one node only (not cluster-wide)

## Notes
* CTOP should run on anything, but I've only tested it on Ubuntu.
* CTOP should run on anything. Originally was developed on Ubuntu, runs
great on CentOS and MacOS X.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we change this to: "Originally was developed on Ubuntu, and it's reported to run on CentOS and MacOS X"?

Great is relative 8)

@crufter
Copy link
Contributor

crufter commented Mar 23, 2015

I am not familiar MX4J so I don't know how correct is the option name change. Otherwise it looks good to me 👍 cc @chrusty

Vadzim Tonka and others added 2 commits March 23, 2015 19:39
@chrusty
Copy link
Owner

chrusty commented Mar 30, 2015

The suggested changes look fine to me, but I'd like to keep the port called "MX4JPort" rather than "cassandraPort", because this port is opened by the MX4J plugin rather than by cassandra itself.

This should remind people that they need to be running Cassandra with MX4J if they find that it doesn't work.

The rest of the stuff looks good though.

chrusty added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 30, 2015
Basic command line options enhancement
@chrusty chrusty merged commit dfddef1 into chrusty:master Mar 30, 2015
@ulfbert-inc
Copy link
Contributor Author

@chrusty thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants